Ilgar Altay: Although it is risky, but I am planning to visit to Iran, Tehran and Tabriz and to investigate social-political situation there. We talked to dr. Ilqar Altay, independent isvestigator, head of Public Researches Center about some of last public-political problems. [b]- Mr. Altay, the report of ?Mazlumdar? law-protection organization of Turkey about human rights situation in Azerbaijan caused serious discussions. You had a research about ?Mavi Marmara? incident in Mediterranean Sea which has caused conflict between Turkey and Israel; you touched ?Mazlumdar? organization in this research. Generally, what can you speak about this organization?[/b] - ?Mazlumdar? is one of the main organizations like well-known IHH (Human Rights Freedom) which has not only mission in Turkey, but they also organizers of ?Mavi Marmara? mission for Gazza. All its administration numbers had been in the ship during the incident. Their slogan was that they defend the rights of all people despite of their religion, race and nationality. But their activity is Islam tendentious and especially it is directed in the protection of extremist religion. [b]- It is said that ?Mazlumdar? and IHH were created and supported by the Kurdish terrorist organization PKK. How do you think is this claim is true?[/b] - I have been to Istanbul office of this organization connected with ?Mavi Marmara? investigation in 2010. I have observed their work activity; I had some questionnaire with the administration and members. To my mind, this organizations was not based on PKK. ?Mazlumdar?, IHH-Human Rights Freedom and some other big, strong, Islam based organizations are under the control of Turkey government. That is why PKK factor is impossible here. But according to my investigation, these organizations are much close to Shiite faith in Islam region. To my mind, their guarantee and indemnity is based on Syria, then on Iran. [b]- And how do think, is there any meaning in the report of this organization about Azerbaijan? Or it is just a report of an international law-defense organization?[/b] - It is obvious that human rights situation is not good in Azerbaijan. That is why any negative report of any organization is not surprising. But there is one issue here. If we pay attention these activations of ?Mazlumdar? towards Azerbaijan always meets the threat campaign period of Iran against our country... [b]- See, this is interesting...[/b] - We must think what is the grief of such organizations like ?Mazlumdar?? Are they indeed interested in the grief of poor people? [b]- Arabian revolutions don?t stop. As if Arabian countries has stood in the row in this problem. How much will it continue in your view?[/b] - All these dictatorships are generated from the Cold War after the 2nd World War of the Super Strength. Their existence has been used for the opposite side by the great powers for long years. They have been used for geostrategical, political, ideological and economic purposes. Today globalization has reached the level that great powers try to solve their problems themselves. Dictatorships have already lost their importance for them. So such dictatorships are considered even obstacles; for example, the friend of the USA, Mubarekh, Ben Ali. Already Russia leaves its dictator friends alone; for example Lukashenko. That is why they all will be seen off depending on time. [b]- How do you think, are the revolutions important for democratization in such countries, or peaceful ways are not exception?[/b] - It depends on the government, its anti-democratic actions, its violations, oppressions against the light, gifted and patriot layer of the society and etc. Is it possible to turn back to democracy to be under legal proceedings? By to my mind, in any case the risk to turn back from bad action is much less than the risk to move forward until the end. Private essence of dictatorship regime demands the special investigation. Historically, civil societies have been in more compromise mood, more compliant than the governments. This factor must be used in time in dialogues. [b]- Mr. Altay, how about your next independent investigations?[/b] - My activity is especially in international direction. My country inside last investigation has been last year. It was analysis of the general situation of expertise system of the country and of Eynulla Fatullayev?s unfair court on narcotic issue. Then I had investigation on ?Black transplantation? human organ trade in Ukraine. Then I had been to Iran, Tehran, ?Sahar? TV program. My ?Iran investigations? article was published. Although it was a bit risky, but I am planning to visit to Iran, Tabriz and to continue the investigation of public-political situation there. At the same time, the most interesting topic is airplane catastrophe of Poland president Lekh Kachinski and 88 public elite. I have a lot facts of this investigation in this sphere and I have to complete them. [b]- The investigations held by Russia and Poland governments has created some contradiction between the countries?[/b] - There were some aspects when public commission and interrogation results did not correspond to each other. Russia blamed Poland pilots in airplane catastrophe in Smolensk in April 10, 2010. But Poland claims that Russia dispatchers and disordered aerodrome is guilty in this catastrophe. But according to my investigation, there is one more strong reason ? political factor, especially Putin factor. [b]- So, there are too many questions in this issue...[/b] - There are a lot of dark factors. More than 100 thousand Polish people were shot by Stalin in 1940. This slaughter is the heaviest national catastrophe of Poland people. So that, this catastrophe which caused 70 years serious conflict between two countries, have must been remembered by the state heads. But strange is that this ceremony is implemented by the 2nd persons of both countries. The Prime Minister of Poland came to Smolensk with the invitation of Putin in the 7th of April, 2010 and was met there with great luxuriously. 3 days after this President Kaczynski took all political elite and went to Smolensk, and no one meets him there. Isn?t it strange? Old Smolensk military aerodrome does not have technical equipments to accept big passenger airplanes. The special navigation equipment was placed in the aerodrome in the 7th of April before Putin and Tusk came here. All the equipments were taken after they went. The aerodrome didn?t have technical opportunity to accept airplane in misty weather condition when Kaczynski came in the 10th of April. When the state airplane #1 landed, it has touched to the trees and burst in the land. 96 people have died together with the crew. [b]- So, was Kaczynski undesirable for Moscow?[/b] - Lech Kaczynski was very patriot, simple and democratic person in nature. He preferred state interest more than policy and of course had some serious problems with neighbor country Russia. It is completely different issue. But I think the head of one important state of the world like Poland and his political elite come to the territory of another state. Official rule requires if it was undesirable so it would not agreed from the beginning, but if it was agreed then Polish state leadership had to be met in the required manner. The plane of president Kaczynski had to be land despite of difficult weather condition on that day. The important event was remembered as national tragedy. There they were waited by polish journalists, society, and relatives of victims. [b]- So is it seems that there were enough chances to avoid the catastrophe?[/b] - The investigations show that it was possible to land airplane even in 400 meters misty weather condition if Russian leadership didn?t show indifference. It is confirmed by well-known Russian flight expert Magomed Tolbuyev also. Attention of military dispatchers, who guided landing process, was directed by the instructions of higher military command in Moscow. They couldn?t freely carry out their functions, also were unable to make decision independently. It seems they were in high emotional constraint, pressure and anxiety situation. They had no strength to forbid or regulate the landing process concretely. Thus, they confused polish pilots in difficult weather condition. Thus these investigations must have been still continued. [center][/center]